Comparison of results for replacement of eta in equ.(8c) line 2 and 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2008, January , 21st For this comparison Heim's values for W(N=0) have been used here c.f. Heim"s script dated 1989 case A : eta replaced by eta q,k case B : eta replaced by eta q,1 for Omega-: p is increased by 1 in case A and case B for o++ : p is nonsens in both cases because N3 becomes 0.0077 for particle Omega- , p , Sigma-, o+ and o- number p comes right in case B but not in case A Conclusion : use of etaq,1 is proposed ========================================== tabulated Qnums 1 17 26 30 28 1 0 1 1 1 0 k= 1 q= 1 n3tab= 1.934430794812033 K+ 4.9375051E+02 1 17 26 30 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N = = K+ 4.9375051E+02 1 17 26 30 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 with EQ1 using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 -1 0 1 0 k= 1 q= 1 n3tab= 1.934430794812033 e- 5.1068221E-01 1 0 0 0 -1 1 1 -1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N = = e- 5.1068221E-01 1 0 0 0 -1 1 1 -1 0 1 0 with EQ1 using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 1 11 6 11 6 1 1 -1 1 1 0 k= 1 q= 1 n3tab= 1.934430794812033 mue- 1.0564335E+02 1 11 6 11 3 1 1 -1 1 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N = = mue- 1.0564335E+02 1 11 6 11 3 1 1 -1 1 1 0 with EQ1 using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 1 12 9 2 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 k= 1 q= 1 n3tab= 1.934430794812033 pi+ 1.3957205E+02 1 12 9 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N = = pi+ 1.3957205E+02 1 12 9 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 with EQ1 using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 4 4 -1 -15 0 3 -1 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 1 n3tab= 2.532202845873784 N3heim= 2.59 Omega- 1.6719938E+03 2 4 4 0 -13 0 3 -1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N Omega- 1.6720878E+03 2 4 4 0 8 0 3 -1 0 1 0 with EQ1 better using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 1 n3tab= 2.532202845873784 p 9.3809117E+02 2 0 0 1 6 1 1 1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N p 9.3819088E+02 2 0 0 0 -14 1 1 1 0 1 0 with EQ1 better using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 2 7 -17 2 1 1 -1 1 1 0 k= 2 q= 1 n3tab= 2.532202845873784 Theta- 1.3212068E+03 2 2 7 -17 -14 1 1 -1 1 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N Theta- 1.3212325E+03 2 2 7 -17 -7 1 1 -1 1 1 0 with EQ1 better using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 2 6 -1 6 1 1 0 1 1 0 k= 2 q= 0 n3tab= 2.718281828459045 Theta0 1.3148933E+03 2 2 6 -1 6 1 1 0 1 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N = = Theta0 1.3148933E+03 2 2 6 -1 6 1 1 0 1 1 0 with EQ1 ............................................. tabulated Qnums 2 2 -7 -12 10 2 1 1 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 1 n3tab= 2.532202845873784 Sigma+ 1.1893042E+03 2 2 -7 -12 -14 2 1 1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N Sigma+ 1.1893466E+03 2 2 -7 -12 -6 2 1 1 0 1 0 with EQ1 better using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 2 -6 -5 -8 2 1 -1 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 1 n3tab= 2.532202845873784 Sigma- 1.1971689E+03 2 2 -6 -4 1 2 1 -1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N Sigma- 1.1972419E+03 2 2 -6 -5 -17 2 1 -1 0 1 0 with EQ1 better using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 2 1 9 4 3 3 2 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 2 n3tab= .007788036071747 ## falsch ## o++ 1.2255183E+03 2 2 1 66 -73 3 3 2 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N falsch o++ 1.2256066E+03 2 2 1 66 -72 3 3 2 0 1 0 with EQ1 using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 2 -1 -1 -6 3 3 1 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 1 n3tab= 2.532202845873784 o+ 1.2346060E+03 2 2 -1 0 -1 3 3 1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N o+ 1.2347000E+03 2 2 -1 -1 -16 3 3 1 0 1 0 with EQ1 better using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 2 -1 -16 -15 3 3 -1 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 1 n3tab= 2.532202845873784 o- 1.2299366E+03 2 2 -1 -15 1 3 3 -1 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N o- 1.2299653E+03 2 2 -1 -16 -19 3 3 -1 0 1 0 with EQ1 better using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 -24 -31 -34 -15 1 1 0 0 1 0 k= 2 q= 0 n3tab= 2.718281828459045 nue4 2.6434364E-02 2 -24 -31 -34 -14 1 1 0 0 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N = = nue4 2.6434364E-02 2 -24 -31 -34 -14 1 1 0 0 1 0 with EQ1 using COMPUTED qnums tabulated Qnums 2 -24 -31 -34 -15 1 1 0 1 1 0 k= 2 q= 0 n3tab= 2.718281828459045 nue5 2.1237505E-01 2 -24 -31 -34 -14 1 1 0 1 1 0 using EQK k n m p sig P Q qL kapp eps N = = nue5 2.1237505E-01 2 -24 -31 -34 -14 1 1 0 1 1 0 with EQ1 using COMPUTED qnums