07.12.2009 
0 ^ 0 = 1, accuracy

Dear Olaf,

Mathcad calculates 0 ^ 0 = 1, just as Mr. Heim, so there must be calculated
because the values obtained agree.
With respect to the values y = 0, are due to F = 0, but be careful, if you
look at the equation (21c), for P = 3, is F = 1 - (P..3) * ( 1 + D) = - D,
which is zero for Mathcad (Wrong!). This is a problem with all small values,
now I do not know as Mr. Heim was able to obtain them.
I do not know is like excel or fortran or C. I believe that to calculate
definitively and without a doubt, we must use Decimal128(*) in some of the
above mentioned language.
I got Intel Fortran 11.1 and Intel C++ 11.1, but never programmed in these
languages. Maybe they bear Decimal128(*).

Greetings,
Javier

(*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754-2008

---------------
24.11.2009 
Resonances

Dear Sirs:
 

I could reproduce the values in tables IV to Vb.

You get some different values of KB but the masses are almost identical.

The exception are the resonances of K+ (values below) and the resonances of the Omicron (values roughly double). Therefore there are problems with the terms activated by:

(k,P,kappa,x) = (1,1,1,1) for the first case, and (k,P,kappa,x) = (2,3,0,1..4) for the second.

Best regards

-----------
23.11.2009 
eq. (14a)

Dear Sirs:

I just programmed the equations (14) and attached the results for some
particles. Surprisingly the question of eta in equation (14a) shows that the
product eta11 * eta12 gives the correct values for the case in which the
term of the equation is activated, (k = 2 and P = 2).
Moreover P = 3 gives incorrect values (again the delta particles), I will
investigate this.

Best regards.

Javier